Joel Smalley: deadly COVID-19 vaccination statistics

MOSCOW, 01 Nov 2021, RUSSTRAT Institute.

The mass vaccination campaign against coronavirus, which started in late 2020-early 2021, has good, we can say excellent, statistical support. With rare exceptions, all countries of the world (even economically backward ones) have established systems for statistical accounting of vaccinations against COVID-19.

The latest data is promptly given on the number of doses of drugs injected into people; the number of partially and completely (usually two doses) vaccinated; the proportion of vaccinated in relation to the total population of the country. Sometimes a breakdown is also given by age groups and types of injected vaccines.

The data of national vaccination statistics are collected and consolidated by some organisations that quickly give a general picture of the world and regions. Johns Hopkins University (USA) is considered one of the most authoritative centres for the accumulation and processing of statistical information on the COVID-19 pandemic and vaccination against this virus.

A huge amount of statistical information on the topic of the pandemic and vaccination is accumulating, but, alas, there are very few serious analyses of these data sets.

Therefore, the posting earlier this month on the Internet of a video entitled “COVID Deaths Before and After Vaccination Programs” did not go unnoticed. This is not a documentary or filming of some events in the world. This is a video representation of a series of graphs compiled on the basis of statistical data from Johns Hopkins University.

The author of calculations and graphs is Joel Smalley, an English analyst and a specialist in quantitative data processing. The Englishman processed statistics on forty countries and revealed the same pattern: these countries experience sharp spikes in new diseases and deaths from COVID-19 after a large batch of COVID-19 vaccines is introduced into them.

“COVID vaccines are between 50% and 80% effective in reducing severe illness and death,” says Smalley. “They have to be at least 50% to retain emergency use authorisation.”

In reality, vaccines no longer demonstrate such effectiveness. Without going into many subtleties, I note that the effectiveness of the vaccine is a percentage reduction in cases of the disease in the vaccinated group of people compared to the group of people who did not receive the vaccination.

I will add that there was euphoria at the start of vaccination. A number of drugs showed efficacy even exceeding 80%. The effectiveness of Pfizer and Moderna vaccines was estimated at 91% during the initial period of the vaccination campaign from December 14, 2020 to April 10, 2021. But in August, according to the American medical regulator CDC (The Centres for Disease Control and Prevention), their effectiveness fell to 66%. In September, the efficiency, according to the calculations of British experts, fell below the bar of 50%, its value was 49%.

Medical regulators in the United States and other countries attributed such a decrease to the appearance of the delta virus strain. There are explanations, but the efficiency is falling. In early October, the results of a new study were published. It showed that the effectiveness of Pfizer’s vaccine had already dropped to 47% at the end of September.

Some doctors and experts believe that the actual effectiveness of vaccines is at the level of 20-30%. For example, in early October, an article with an analysis of the results of vaccination in Qatar appeared in the authoritative English journal The New England Journal of Medicine. There, the effectiveness of the second doses of vaccines is estimated at 20%.

But even if we take officially recognised indicators, they are below the minimum level of 50%, which Joel Smalley calls. What is below this bar, according to Smalley (as well as the opinion of reputable doctors), means that the disadvantages of vaccination already undoubtedly outweigh the advantages. The vaccine no longer cures, but cripples.

If the “pros” of vaccines are measured relatively accurately, then the “cons” are a big question. These are the costs of vaccinations, expressed in side effects and deaths. In many countries, the “cons” are not measured or even roughly estimated. Unfortunately, side effects are often not accounted for.

In a small group of countries, there are systems for accounting and assessing consequences (including deaths). This is primarily the USA with the VAERS (Vaccine Inverse Event Reporting System) system. In the European Union (27 States) this is the EudraVigilance (EV) system. I am also aware of similar systems in the UK and Australia. In these countries, data on the side effects of vaccines are open.

I assume that in a number of countries there are systems for collecting information about the “side effects” of vaccinations that do not publish the final figures, the information is secret. But the open data provided by the systems of the USA, the EU, the UK and Australia, according to experts, are underestimated.

So, in the USA today, the number of deaths from vaccinations, according to VAERS, is more than 17,000 people. According to experts, this indicator is understated at least five-fold. The understatement of mortality figures is also indicated by the study published in early September, “Estimating the number of COVID vaccine deaths in America”, which was published in early September.

The authors are American researchers Jessica Rose and Mathew Crawford. The authors prove that the VAERS data is understated at least ten-fold. Consequently, the number of deaths from vaccinations in just less than nine months is 170,000 people.

For comparison, I note that during the decade of the Vietnam War (1965-1975), the US human losses amounted to 58,000 people. And these losses were perceived by America as a national tragedy. Today, the losses from vaccination are simply astronomical against the background of Vietnamese victims. But these losses are not perceived as a tragedy, and the American authorities are not trying to stop an undeclared war against their own people.

I think that taking into account the increasingly pronounced “negatives” of vaccinations, the real assessment of the “minuses” must inevitably increase. And, probably, the lower threshold value of the effectiveness of the vaccine should not be 50% (as with Joel Smalley), but at least 90%. This is what more radical doctors think.

Joel Smalley is an analyst and mathematician involved in identifying correlations. He gives a tip to doctors so that they, based on his correlation analysis, identify cause-and-effect relationships and make adjustments to methods of combating COVID-19.

Patrick Delaney from Life Site News comments on the calculations of an English analyst: “Although the correlation does not prove a causal relationship, a broader examination of the relevant data among vaccinated people reveals a worldwide trend towards high rates of infections, hospitalisations and deaths”.

Detailed comments on the calculations of the English analyst are contained in the article of Arsenio Toledo in an independent publication NewsTarget.com . It is called “Johns Hopkins data PROVES distribution of COVID-19 vaccines led to spikes in infections and deaths”.

The author draws attention to the fact that of the 40 countries analysed, the closest correlation between the number of doses of vaccinations and the number of infected and deceased was recorded in the UK, Israel and Taiwan. These countries have not only fulfilled, but also exceeded the tasks of the World Health Organisation (WHO) on the coverage of the population with vaccinations. And it was there that the greatest spikes in diseases and deaths were recorded after they crossed the finish line.

The author of the article cites an interesting detail that is not very advertised by the leading media: Even Pfizer has recognised this correlation when it revealed in a document submitted to the Food and Drug Administration that the company’s COVID-19 vaccine makes people around 300 percent more likely to get COVID-19.

In this regard, Arsenio Toledo reminds readers of a very resonant study carried out by the famous American physician Dr. Peter McCullough. According to this study, “in the nasal cavity of vaccinated people, the number of COVID-19 viruses is 251 times greater than in those who are not vaccinated.” By the way, this study is not a secret; it was published in August in the prestigious medical journal The Lancet.

Arsenio Toledo’s article contains a whole collection of examples confirming the general conclusion of Joel Smalley’s calculations. Here are some.

In September, about 75% of people in Vermont (USA) who died from COVID-19 were fully vaccinated.

Public Health England has acknowledged that about 63% of people in the UK who died from the post-vaccination delta variant were also vaccinated.

And here is an example of Israel. Dr. Kobi Haviv, director of Herzog Hospital in Jerusalem, during a speech on Israel’s Channel 13, noted that “most of the population” of Israel has already been vaccinated. Despite this, his hospital still receives many patients with COVID-19.

According to Haviv, 85 to 90% of those admitted to the Duke Hospital are fully vaccinated. In addition, about 95% of patients with severe COVID-19 disease are also vaccinated. “We are opening new COVID offices,” says Haviv, “The effectiveness of the vaccine is weakening.”

It is noteworthy that my attempts to use the links available in the article by Arsenio Toledo to find the statements of the Israeli physician in a “live form” were unsuccessful. The “World Inquisition”, represented by Google, Facebook and other Silicon Valley IT corporations, has removed them all.

Arsenio Toledo briefly mentions the confessions of the British BBC news agency. This famous information resource made a “Freudian slip”, which quickly spread throughout England.

On September 24, the BBC published the article “Covid-19 in Wales: A third of positive cases are unvaccinated”. It indicates that only in 13% of COVID-19 cases requiring hospitalisation, people were not vaccinated. This means that the remaining 87% are partially or completely vaccinated.

Special attention should be paid to the following paragraph of the article: “Although 80% of patients have been double-dosed with a vaccine, public health officials said this is not evidence that the vaccine is not working – and that vaccines keep 95% of people out of hospital.”

Isn’t that a Freudian slip of the tongue? People were vaccinated, they got sick, but for the most part they suffer at home, not in the hospital. Inspiring news!  They may die at home. The lethal outcome after vaccination occurs on average later than in those who became infected and were ill without vaccination.

Experts pay attention to this trick: for example, a vaccinated person dies 29 days after the injection. Their death is registered with a diagnosis unrelated to Covid, since, according to the standards of the USA, Great Britain and a number of other countries, if death occurred no later than four weeks after the injection (28 days), then it can be attributed to vaccination.

It is possible to also add such a “detail” to the picture that the BBC presented.

The Natural News news agency reports that in Scotland at the end of September, health authorities registered 616 deaths from COVID-19 from fully vaccinated individuals since the beginning of the mass vaccination program in the country.

The Scottish authorities are trying to assign blame for most of these deaths by saying that, apparently, since August 9, many restrictions have been lifted in the country, and this caused deaths. What kind of vaccination protection is this if, it turns out, the vaccinated person needs to continue to maintain self-isolation, distancing, wearing a mask and regularly doing PCR tests? Alas, this is how the builders of the “brave new world” see the “new normality” (the expression of the WEF President Klaus Schwab).

In conclusion, I would like to note that the number of publications and studies devoted to the assessment of the “disadvantages” of vaccinations is growing rapidly all over the world. The “World Inquisition”, thank God, does not have time to ban them all. Finally, work similar to Joel Smalley’s research began to appear in Russia.

In this regard, I would like to draw attention to an interesting article authored by three domestic specialists: N.V. Bocharov, Candidate of Medical Sciences, Honoured Doctor of the Russian Federation; V.N. Laskavy, Doctor of Veterinary Sciences, Honoured Veterinarian of the Russian Federation; T.I. Polyanina, Candidate of Biological Sciences, Deputy General Director for Science of LLC SARBIOTEKH. The article was published in the newspaper “President” and is called “The impact of vaccination from COVID-19 on the increase in morbidity and mortality from coronavirus”. The name speaks for itself. I recommend you to get acquainted with it.

Institute for International Political and Economic Strategies – RUSSTRAT

Share:

Share on facebook
Facebook
Share on twitter
Twitter
Share on pinterest
Pinterest
Share on linkedin
LinkedIn
On Key

Related Posts

On AIR

Russtrat world